Politically Outspoken Comments

artliquide: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (artliquide) — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:32:07 -0800

I try to stay out of the 9/11 conspiracy Digg submissions, but I have seen enough of them (my boyfriend loves to bury truther submissions). Frankly, I really wish that Digg had a 9/11 conspiracy filter so that we could all coexist peacefully. I wouldn't have to see the millions of truther submissions, and could actually get better diversity out of my Digg experience. Those of us who think that truthers continue to fail to prove their point logically and just keep flooding us with unfounded claims could finally ignore you and move on to something more relevant. You would no longer be subjected to criticism. Life would be so beautiful!

Seriously. Enough already. Stop spamming Digg. There's a reason people bury truther submissions. They're annoying. It's not abuse. It's how Digg is supposed to work.

Personally, I think that truthers should get themselves some land and live in a commune somewhere. You guys can keep claiming "guilty until proven innocent" and the rest of us can lose an annoyance that interrupts our daily enjoyment on Digg.

It's not abuse. It's logic.

DragonFly: Tony Blair: hob nob extrordinaire?

nospam@example.com (DragonFly) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:48:15 -0800

An interesting mix that Mr. Blair.

I cannot think of him without envisioning a lapdog who barks and rolls over upon command.

charlie: We Are Idiots

nospam@example.com (charlie) — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 07:28:56 -0800

The girl in front is about to go Pete Tong on him. He probably got out ok....

bill sherman: ONE TIN SOLDIER

nospam@example.com (bill sherman) — Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:57:06 -0800

Like the thought process although the red side it seems would have all the guns. I was in the military and not a lot of liberals or Neodems living in that ecosystem. Mostly conservative red staters with a hatred for liberals. Numbers wise very few veterans are liberals, that mindset and military service don't seem to go well together.

And even states with Dems like Montana which is a Red state even though it has a Purple Democratic govenor. Lots of red staters with guns in the middle of the country. I see the Red-Blue thing playing out as west coast, rust belt and the new england states against the rest of the country.

WTS

Zeroxmd: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (Zeroxmd) — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:21:28 -0700

Poor poor trolls. Secret is out and you got your panties all in a bundle. Bury Brigade is full of heartless trolls who don't care about our rights being stolen, and are openly trying to steal the rest of them. Shameless fools who refuse to see the history of the info they are trying to hide. You guys are morons. You call us liars when we talk about verified, declassified, or openly reported material (like the atempted Nazi coup-de-tat in 1933, but you just deny it every happened)

DragonFly: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (DragonFly) — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:55:27 -0700

'Accuracy' is obviously not terribly important to 'eagle', whereas 'spitefulness' is.

sullivan: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (sullivan) — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:30:22 -0700

Eagle, perhaps you ought to learn how an English sentence is constructed before you go posting illiterate garbage like "Your a idiot"

Krunchpow: We Are Idiots

nospam@example.com (Krunchpow) — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:49:36 -0700

Teehee, they ARE idiots.

James: We Are Idiots

nospam@example.com (James) — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 12:53:55 -0700

haha nice

DragonFly: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (DragonFly) — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:04:26 -0700

Thanks 'mreguy', 'FemaCamper' and 'TC' for your support.

I know I'm on a 'troll hit list' over at Digg, and this has made it more difficult for me to share information about critical issues.

It's telling when a group of people work so hard to suppress others from sharing information that they truly believe is newsworthy.

If they disagree with other points of view, thats fine and I understand.
It's their right.

But why not just allow the community to make up their own mind on these issues?

TC: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (TC) — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:37:08 -0700

Hey there, great to see someone else who's trying to counter these serial buriers. I am not v. technologically sophisticated or anything, they just piss me off, look for "toddcat", particularly via rawstory and crooksandliars stories as I just enjoy smacking them down. I wish I could do something more to serially counter them. Ah well-thanks very much.....it's amazing and you know these guys must be getting their instructions from somewhere coz they just don't like the truth. Cheers.

mreguy: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (mreguy) — Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:09:45 -0700

Trolls will be buried.

FemaCamper: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (FemaCamper) — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:40:21 -0700

No worries! We've found the solution:

http://digg.com/politics/Bury_the_Trolls

>

RB: Same Babble, Different Invasion

nospam@example.com (RB) — Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:38:03 -0700

What countries has Iran invaded lately?

What is the 'human rights' record of Iran as opposed to the USA's regarding people put in prison and those put to death?

DragonFly: Will Digg's Content Be Decided by Organized Trollers?

nospam@example.com (DragonFly) — Sun, 01 Jul 2007 16:21:44 -0700

Abuse does not always accomplish it's intended goal.

Although you and I have very different ideas on certain topics, I can appreciate your persistence, and wish you well.
I hope that we can both come to understand that different opinions do not require hateful responses.